Mallorca's impeachment trial postponed until next week – Top Stories (Trending Perfect)

[ad_1]

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) postponed until Monday the impeachment trial of the first Cabinet member in history, responding to concerns from some conservatives who are concerned about the start of a trial in the Senate on the same day she is scheduled to leave the chamber for… House of Representatives session. week.

House impeachment managers were originally scheduled to file two articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Wednesday. The trial probably would not have begun until Thursday afternoon after Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida addressed a joint session of Congress that morning. Now, the articles will likely be transmitted on Monday, prompting the Senate to begin the trial on Tuesday.

A spokesman for Johnson said: “To ensure that the Senate has sufficient time to fulfill its constitutional duty, the House will transmit the articles of impeachment to the Senate next week.” “There is absolutely no reason for the Senate to abdicate its responsibility to conduct an impeachment trial.”

The statement was issued after Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) thanked Johnson during a press conference for changing the start of the impeachment trial to “the beginning of the legislative week instead of the end.”

“We don't want this to happen on the eve of the moment when members may be working under the influence of jet fuel poisoning,” Lee explained.

Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D.N.Y.) — who is expected to move to the table or reject the articles He said Tuesday that regardless of the delay, Democrats will stick with their original plan. to Decline or schedule a trial, simple A majority is required, which means Democrats, who have a 51-49 majority, have little room for error. At least one Republican — Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) — has said he plans to vote against a full trial.

Schumer said the accusations were “ridiculous” and did not rise to the level of impeachment and suggested he would try to end the trial before it actually began. “We will move forward and resolve this issue as quickly as possible. Again, accountability should never be used to settle political differences.

“We are ready to go wherever they are,” Schumer told reporters. “We're sticking to our plan. We're going to get this moving as quickly as we can.”

The articles of impeachment were expected to reach the Senate on the same day that Mayorkas will be in Congress to defend the Department of Homeland Security's budget, where he is expected to request higher funding levels than in the deal approved by the White House last month. Congress to avoid a government shutdown. This deal receives less funding than the bipartisan border deal that collapsed in February, after Republicans thwarted efforts to reform the immigration system. At the request of the former and supposed president Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.

House Republicans had delivered the articles to the Senate on the back of testimony from the head of the Department of Homeland Security who helped craft the bipartisan bill that would have allocated $20 billion in emergency funding for border security and immigration — and who had previously lamented the agency as “ always”. “Financially Hungry” section.

Both The articles of impeachment accusing Mayorkas of “willful and systematic refusal to comply with the law” and violating the public trust have drawn a sharp challenge from Democrats, constitutional scholars and a few GOP lawmakers who argue that the charges were narrowly passed by House Republicans by a single member. The vote earlier this year amounted not to high crimes and misdemeanors, but rather to policy differences.

House Republicans argued that Mayorkas — who has broad legal jurisdiction in enforcing border laws — had violated provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which mandates the detention of any deportable immigrant. They contend that a 2021 memorandum signed by Mayorkas ordering immigration officials to take a different approach to prioritizing who should be detained in the United States — given limited detention facilities and massive immigration court backlogs — runs counter to the language of the law. Led by Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, GOP lawmakers also charge that Mayorkas acted outside the scope of his authority to expand the number of humane parole programs available to immigrants. These programs allow non-citizens to live and work in the United States temporarily and legally.

House Republican impeachment managers, who are scheduled to present charges to the Senate after a ceremonial march through the Capitol, include Greene, and Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene (Georgia), Michael McCaul (Texas), and Andy Biggs (Arizona). August Pfluger (TX), Ben Kline (VA), Andrew R. Garbarino (NY), Michael Guest (Miss.), Harriet Hagman (Wyo.), Clay Huggins (LA), and Laurel Lee (FL). .

Senators must take the oath as a group, raising their right hand when Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.) is chosen to preside over the trial. – He reads aloud the oath in which he swears that they will dispense “impartial justice” in this matter. Then each senator must sign the oath book in front of the chamber in groups of four. Democrats are considering moving quickly to dismiss the trial or bringing it up shortly after that process, a maneuver that could require 51 votes to pass.

There may be attempts to delay it. “But we hope we can resolve these delays and give this impeachment officer the impeachment she so richly deserves,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.).

Efforts to prolong the trial, and perhaps force Democrats to cast some tough votes, are now likely to materialize without senators rushing to catch flights home.

Many Republicans argued Tuesday that Democrats should not break with precedent by skipping the trial and moving to dismiss the charges. They intend to at least try to influence the process by introducing procedural barriers such as raising points of order, which prevent this Certain actions or considerations that violate the procedures and statutes of the Senate. Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) said it was “extremely serious” that Democrats would not fulfill what he called their “constitutional obligation” to hold a trial.

“I intend to do everything I can to make an impact “This process is so we can do our jobs,” Schmidt added.

Some House Republicans were particularly angry about Johnson's decision to delay the trial, which has languished since the House passed it after an embarrassing initial defeat in February when three GOP lawmakers voted against impeaching Mayorkas.

Host Conservative senators have previously poured cold water on the charges and deemed them useless, criticizing the use of what was designed to be a rarely used constitutional tool as a weapon in partisan warfare. But most of them decided to vote against the motion to dismiss the trial.

Senator Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina) admitted: “I think we are dangerously close to using impeachment as a kind of vote of no confidence.” “But in this regard, I have no confidence in Mayorkas because we have a border situation that is out of control,” he added, dodging the question of whether Mayorkas was guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.

Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), the chief Republican architect of the bipartisan border security deal, said Republicans need to proceed with the trial strictly out of consideration of historical precedent. Others described the trial as a politically useful opportunity for Republicans to attack Democrats on immigration, an issue that voters overwhelmingly disapprove of President Biden's handling of. Sen. Kevin Cramer (R.N.D.) called the articles “a little strange” but recommended that Republicans make the most of them.

“The border issue is a great issue for us to talk about as Republicans,” Cramer said. “My personal belief is that the House did it, so here we are now, maybe we should make the most of it. … There's no doubt that the details of things on the border now, a few months after the election, are very good for Republicans.”

Romney is the only Republican to say he would vote to dismiss the prosecution, noting that the border is a “disaster” but that Mayorkas did not commit high crimes and misdemeanors. Another potential defector, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), declined to comment on her impartiality as a trial juror.

Democrats criticized Republicans for what they called a “sham” impeachment process, underscoring the hypocrisy of Republican demands from Mayorkas, while at the same time denying it. Additional resources. Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), a vulnerable Democrat facing re-election, left the door open to prosecution if House Republicans include any border security policies in their articles of impeachment.

“The truth is that we had an opportunity to fix the border and close it. And [Republicans] “They voted ‘no’ because they had someone who said we want to keep this a political issue, and that’s exactly what they continue to do with this,” Tester said of Republicans. “They can try to politicize this — and in fact, if this was a politicized document that we saw in the House, I would vote to impeach it and get the hell out of it.” “If there are political things that really make sense, I'll take a look at them and we'll evaluate it from there.”

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), who worked closely with Lankford to craft the bipartisan border deal, said an impeachment trial could backfire when voters are reminded that Republicans blocked the border compromise they demanded from Democrats.

“People are willing to believe that Republicans are not being honest when it comes to how much they talk about the border and how little they actually do to fix the problem,” Murphy said. “And I think this impeachment debacle has the potential to backfire on them because for the first time in a long time, voters are starting to grapple with the reality that Republicans may be smoke and no fire when it comes to actually trying to fix things.” Immigration problem.”

[ad_2]

Source

Leave a comment