Greene escalates the threat against Johnson, and raises the case for his ouster – Top Stories (Trending Perfect)


Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on Tuesday escalated her threat to impeach House Speaker Mike Johnson, distributing a scathing letter defending his impeachment and accusing Republicans of tolerating his leadership.

In a five-page memo sent to colleagues on Tuesday morning, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, Ms. Greene, a right-wing Republican from Georgia, attacked Mr. Johnson with point-by-point removal. From his record as a speaker. She accused him of unsuccessfully promoting President Biden's agenda and wasting opportunities to advance Republican Party priorities.

Ms Greene warned her colleagues that they risked becoming disconnected from their constituents if they continued to accept what she described as a “total and complete capitulation” by Republicans under Johnson.

The letter left little doubt that Ms. Green, who introduced a resolution last month calling for Mr. Johnson's removal but said it was merely a “warning,” intends to follow through on her threat by calling a vote on his removal.

“If these actions by our conference leader continue, we are not a Republican Party — we are a unilateral party determined to remain on a path of self-destruction,” she wrote. “I will not support or participate in any of that, and neither will the people we represent.”

Her intensified threat came at a difficult time for Mr Johnson, who said he would soon put forward an emergency national security spending package that would include aid to Ukraine, something that angered the far right. He also plans to take a set of tough votes this week on legislation to renew a warrantless surveillance program opposed by many in his party.

In the letter, Ms. Greene reviewed several examples since Johnson took office five months ago when he negotiated with Democrats on key legislation — including multiple federal spending bills to prevent the government from shutting down and an annual defense bill to shore up the government. Ensuring US troops get a pay rise — and making deals she called a betrayal of Republican values. She wrote that his actions “much angered our Republican base and gave them little reason to vote for a Republican majority in the House.”

She condemned members of her own party, adding: “If we win the House this fall, it will only be because President Trump is on the ballot, not because we deserved it.”

Much of her criticism stems from Mr. Johnson's decision last month to pass a bipartisan $1.2 trillion government spending bill — a law that passed with a majority of Republicans who voted against it — prompting Ms. Greene to introduce the resolution calling for Mr. Johnson's removal. .

She said at the time that the move was “more of a warning than a pink slip”, raising questions about whether she was planning to demand a quick vote to oust Mr Johnson or was simply seeking the huge attention that came with the threat. The House of Representatives then left Washington for a two-week recess.

Johnson expressed his hope that this break would help calm the tensions that threatened his hold on the position. In interviews he referred to Ms. Greene as a friend. He said he shared her frustrations about spending legislation and that they had been texting and planning to meet when they returned to Washington.

Now the House is back, and Ms. Green makes it clear she will not be calmed down easily.

“Fully funding abortion, the transgender agenda, the climate agenda, foreign wars, and the Biden border crisis does not guarantee freedom, opportunity, and security for all Americans,” she wrote, citing a list of Mr. Johnson’s top priorities as he takes office. mail.

She also criticized Johnson for failing to stop funding what she called a “witch hunt” by Jack Smith, the special counsel prosecuting Mr. Trump for trying to overturn the 2020 election and mishandling classified documents. Combined, she said, these issues would result in a “death sentence” for Mr. Trump.

“They want him dead, and our strength on appropriations could have stopped us, but Speaker Johnson didn’t even try,” Ms. Greene said of Democrats.

(It is inconceivable that Democrats would agree to cut spending on Mr. Smith’s prosecutions, or that Mr. Biden would sign legislation to do so.)

On Monday night, Ms. Greene also laid out her case against Johnson to voters at a town hall in Tunnel Hill, Georgia. She said: “Am I angry? She said: Yes. “My question is, are you angry?”

Ms. Greene's letter appeared largely aimed at making the House speaker squirm about the Ukraine aid bill, which he has struggled with — initially refusing to take up but more recently yielding to entreaties from Mr. Biden, Democrats, other Republicans and world leaders to do so. So.

“Mike Johnson is publicly saying funding for Ukraine is now his top priority when less than seven months ago he was opposed to it,” Ms. Green wrote. “The American people don’t agree with that — they believe our borders are the only borders worth fighting a war over, and I agree with them.”

For months, Ms. Green has been calling the Ukrainian action a “red line” to oust the Speaker of Parliament. Last week, in an interview with right-wing journalist Tucker Carlson, Ms. Greene wondered aloud whether Mr. Johnson was being blackmailed into bringing up the issue, “because he is so disconnected from what we want.”

Ms. Greene, a rabble-rouser who formed an unlikely alliance with former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy that led to her expulsion from the hard-right House Freedom Caucus, referred to herself in the letter as a “team player,” but she can’t be that. It promises to support the current leadership if it continues on its current path.

She ridiculed the idea of ​​the need for compromise at a moment of divided government.

“Even with our razor-thin Republican majority, we could have at least secured the border, as the No. 1 issue in the country and the issue causing Biden to lose in poll after poll,” Ms. Greene wrote. . “Nothing says shooting inside our tent like a Republican House speaker who gets his members to vote to fully fund abortion in order to pay our military.”

It is not clear whether Ms. Green's arguments will persuade her colleagues, including some other hard-right members who have expressed doubts about the second step of removing a speaker. For example, Rep. Matt Gaetz, the Florida Republican who led the campaign to impeach McCarthy, said that when he made his move in October, “I made a promise to the country that we would not end up with a Democratic president.” With the Republican majority in the House of Representatives having dwindled to one precarious vote since then, Mr. Gaetz said: “I could not make that promise again today.”

Ms. Greene said in her letter that this would only happen if more Republicans retire and the party loses its majority, or Republicans vote for Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the New York Democrat and minority leader.



Leave a comment